The Implicat of Sin in Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter :: Scarlet Letter essays

The Implicat of Sin in The Scarlet Letter             Sin is the transgression of a moral code designated by either association or the transgressor.  The Puritans of Boston in the novel, The Scarlet Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne, establish a rigid moral code by which to purge their society of deviants.  As this society is inherently theocratic, the beliefs and restrictions established by religion are not only incorporated into law but constitute all law.  In this manner, the moral code of the Puritan society thoroughly pervades the lives of its individuals, and any presence of iniquity is felt in all aspects of their lives.  In The Scarlet Letter, the characters lives are controlled by the sin they commit.             Hester Prynnes adultery causes her alienation from the Puritan society in which she lives.  After the term of her confinement ends, she moves into a remote, secluded c ottage on the knocked out(p)skirts of town, inducing a physical separation from the townspeople.  Because of this seclusion from society, the Puritans regard her with much curiosity and suspicion  Children...would creep nigh enough to behold her plying her needle at the cottage-window...and discerning the florid letter on her breast, would scamper off with a strange, contagious fear.  In addition to the physical separation, a more intangible manner of exclusion similarly exists, in that Hester becomes a pariah.  She is subject to derision and malice from the lowliest of vagrants to the most genteel of individuals of the community, though many are often the recipients of her care and attention  The poor...whom she sought out to be the objects of her bounty, often reviled the hand that was stretched forth to succor them...Dames of elevated rank, likewise, were accustomed to distill drops of bitterness into her heart. Hester cannot feel any sort of kinshi p with the townspeople in light of the treatment she receives from them, thus alienating her even further from Puritan society.  Formerly an inhabitant within the bounds of the community as well as a member of the community, she is now outcast in both respects. Just as the act of adultery is pivotal in Hesters life, this sin effects a similar manipulation of Arthur Dimmesdales life.             Dimmesdales guilt over his sin continually torments him throughout

Teenage Alcoholism Essay -- Alcohol Drinking binge Youth Essays

Teenage Alcoholism What is alcohol? Alcohol is many things to many large number To little kids, it is a curiosity. To teenagers, it is ?cool?. To responsible inebriationers, it is a relaxant. To bartenders, it is a job, their lives. To restaurant owners, it is a moneymaker. To probation officers, it is a frustration. To actively imbibing alcoholics, it is heaven. To wives and husbands of drinking alcoholics, it is a waste. To recovering alcoholics, it is a painful elderly friend. To us, it is something to be learned about and controlled. ? (Dolmetsch, p.4) The definition of alcoholism stresses the basic elements of (1) chronicity (2) compulsive, uncontrollable drinking (3) intoxication and (4) interruption of normal life functions. (Claypool, p. 91) When the drinker?s work, kindly life, study habits, mental health, or family and personal relationships are affected, the possibility exists that the drinker may be an alcoholic. If the drinker is able to stop drinking permanently, t hen he is not considered to be an alcoholic. ?For teenagers and adults, alcohol is the most commonly abused drug. It is easy to get, easy to use, and as common in our society as aspirin.? (Claypool, p. 62) Millions of American teenagers drink alcohol. Young people drink for many reasons whether it?s to escape the daily stress of school or family life, or to fit in with their friends. But sadly enough, many teenagers discover too late that drinking cannot solve any of their problems. Teenage drinking is now one of the most serious problems that young people face. (Landau, intro) In 1977, Senator Frank J. Dodd stated ?Alcoholism is one of the greatest health problems in the United States and is one that afflicts individuals in virtually all social and sparing categories and varying age groups.? (Claypool, pp. 90 -91) From the time children reach the age of 13 , 63 portion of the boys and 54 percent of the girls have at least assay their first alcoholic beverage. (Claypool, p. 14) Alcohol use substantially increases each year finishedout junior and senior high school. By the twelfth grade, 93 percent of the young men and 87 percent of the young women have at least tried one drink. Thirty percent of these students had five or much drinks in a row within the previous two weeks. (Landau, p.15) The National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism states that ?By the time ... ...le to pull through successfully. (Dolmetsch, pp. 88, 115) Alcoholism among teenagers in the United States is becoming more widespread than ever before. Current statistics present an unpleasant picture of teenage alcohol use upgrade every year. Alcohol use leads to teens having problems with school, family, or even with authorities. They may drink to escape these problems, or even to fit in with their friends. This problem of teenage drinking is now one of the most serious problems that young people face today, and the only way to stop these statistics from growing, is to educate the teenagers of the risks of drinking alcohol. Works CitedClaypool, Jane. Alcohol and You. new-made York Franklin Watts, 1988. Landau, Elaine. Teenage Drinking. New Jersey Enslow Publishers, Inc. 1994.Lang, Alan. Alcohol Teenage Drinking. New York Chelsea House, 1992.Dolmetsch, Paul, and Gail Mauricette, ed. Teens Talk About Alcohol and Alcoholism. New York Doubleday & Company, Inc. 1987. Spence, W.R. Drinking and Driving Murder on Our Highways. Texas wellness Edco. 1998. Vogler, Roger E. Teenagers and Alcohol When Saying No Isn?t Enough. Philadelphia Charles Press, 1992.

Religion in Public Schools :: Prayer in Public Schools

Religion in the Classroom In the past Religion was confined to the state flat with religiousfreedom all(prenominal)thing has changed or at least started to change. In order forreligion to be in a private initiate now it is over again trying to be in Public rails. People ask why cant freedom to acknowledge god be enjoyed againby children in every schoolroom across this land? In the past, a long timeago children always prayed before class started and before lunch. Butthings pretend changed, in 1791 the separation of church and state started.Although it was made clear about the separation of the two as late as 1951some twenty states permitted schools to begin the sidereal day by reading aloud apassage of the bible. Bu t that had to stop. People didnt have the samebeliefs when it comes to religion, if a family absent even believe in godwhy should their child be forced to pray? On many different occasionsquestions similar to this one were brought up and complained about. Tha tis what started it all real big. When complaining, rock and fighting all started over the si contribute second. In 1978 a few lawyers got together and considered a constitutionallaw. The original law said that public school teachers in gr ades 1-6shall announce that a period of silence, not to exceed one minute, shallbe observed for meditation. This law did not work for long, because itstill allowed oral appeal in public high schools. Later in 1981, theAlabama State Senator D onald G. Holmes successfully passed a bill thatincluded all grades calling it the moment of silence this law said thatthe teacher (was) to announce that the silent moment may be used forvoluntary prayer. Although it would have to be si lent prayer. Even afterthis new law started the lawyers that were opposed to this were trying tosay that students do not have a right to pray in school silently orotherwise because of growing impressions that affect their life. Thesilent mom ent supposedly (forced) re ligion on children. I dont agreewith that at all, if there has to be a moment of silence then any child canuse that moment however he or she wants, it does not necessarily have to beused fro prayer. Usually the chi ldren who have been brought up withprayer or some type of religion are usually proven to be better kids.

The Crucible by Arthur Miller Essay -- The Crucible Arthur Miller Essa

The Crucible by Arthur MillerArthur Miller was an American playwright who was born in 1915. Hegrew up in New York to a Jewish family. He graduated from theUniversity of Michigan in 1938 where he began to distinguish himselfas a playwright. His commencement ceremony plays were Honors at Dawn (1936) and NoVillain (1937) which won the University of Michigan Hopwood Awards. His Death of a Salesman won the Pulitzer prize in 1949. Miller wroteThe Crucible in 1953 during the McCarthy utmost when Americans wereaccusing each other of Pro-Communist beliefs. Many of Millersfriends were being attacked as communists and in 1956, Miller himselfwas brought before the House of Un-American Activities Committee wherehe was found guilty of beliefs in communism. The verdict was reversedin 1957 in an appeals court. Miller married Marylin Monroe in 1956but divorced her in 1961.The Crucible is fix against the backdrop of the touchy witch hunts ofthe Salem witch trials in the late 17th century. It is ab out a town,after accusations from a few girls, which begins a mad hunt forwitches that did not exist. Many townspeople were hanged on chargesof witchcraft. Miller brings out the absurdity of the incident withthe theme of truth and righteousness. The theme is conveyed throughthe struggles of Millers main character, John Proctor.SummaryAct one begins with Reverend Parris praying over her daughter, BettyParris, who lies unconscious on her bed. Through conversationsbetween Reverend Parris and his niece Abigail Williams, and betweenseveral girls, the consultation learns that these girls, including Abigailand Betty, were engaged in occultic activities in the forest lead byTituba, Parris slave from Barbados. Parris caug... ... became more pure thanthe common Puritans, dying as a martyr the likes of the original apostles. Helearned what truth meant through his suffering.Through Proctors struggle, Miller displays the struggles within eachof our own hearts. Many times we contain witnessed some wrong happeningto some other person and wished not to get involved. However,sometimes, like Proctor, there might be something that forces us in. Would we be part with after only saving our wife like Proctor could havedone, or would we go for the entire community as Proctor did?ConclusionThe flooring reminds its readers of an ugly blemish on human history. It reminds us that man is not perfect, and that we can make mistakes. However, even with these mistakes, we can cleanse ourselves and purifyourselves by do what is wrong right. The sufferings become to thesufferer like a crucible.

State Of The Union Address Essay :: essays research papers

State of the Union Address EssayPresident Clinton has declared that "the competitor of our time is inaction,"pledging to forge bipartisan agreements on a balanced budget and campaignfinance reform within months, and to lead a " subject field press out" to improveeducation by the turn of the century. Education, Clinton vowed, would be his"number-one priority for the next four years," and he devoted the longestportion of his address to this. He appealed for "national standards" to improvestudent performance and pledged to promote such standards with voluntary testsprepared by the federal government.Most of the ideas Clinton presented last night first appeared as poll-tested proposals in his reelection campaign last fall expanding the 1993"Family and Medical Leave Act" to include time off from work for parent-teacherconferences school curfews and tax credit and deductions to subsidize collegeeducation. But he presented these ideas using more en com shoting and urgentlanguage than before."We face no imminent threat, but we do have an resistance The enemy of ourtime is inaction," Clinton declared at the start of his speech. He finished, ashe did in last months address, by invoking the symbolism that the nation isabout to pass into a new millennium. "We dont have a moment to waste," he said."Tomorrow, there will be just over 1,000 days until the year 2000. . . . One gibibyte days to work together."The speech proved shorter than predicted and far more organized anddisciplined than some of his previous appearances before Congress. The annualspeeches to Congress have served as markers of Clintons ideological migration.In 1993, he announced that government must do more and unveiled a raft of big-government proposals, including a $30 million "stimulus package" that was vastlymore expensive than any single proposal he offered last night.

Compare the poems and comment on how the way Owen and Southey convey Es

Compare the poems and comment on how the way Owen and Southey convey their attitude towards war - Dulce et decorum EstDulce et Decorum Est tells the story of how Wilfred Owen experiencesworld war first hand and tells of his bitter angst towards thegovernment who try to persuade young men to join the army.Owen developed many of his poetic techniques at Craiglockhart MilitaryHospital where he spent much of the war as an injured soldier, and wasable to express his ideas and feelings on paperHe uses the Latin phrase Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori, whichtranslates into it is sweet and glorious to die for ones country.Owen tells of how this phrase is wrong, how it is not glorious toexperience the harsh reality of war with the explosions and thescreeching of missiles, which he saw with his own eyes. The phrase isdeceptive to the men that are called up as they look to help theircountry and believe that it is something to die for.The poem begins with a slow rhythm through the use of hea vy, longwords, in order to illustrate how slow and painstaking war was. Owensview on war is that it is a dangerous thing to do and using a Latinphrase is just a way of recruiting more troops. He states,My friend, you would not tell with such(prenominal) high zestThe old Lie Dulce et decorum estPro patria moriMy friend refers to another war poet, Jessie Pope, who had acompletely different aspect on war. Owen emphasises the word lie ashe fully believes that the phrase is one.The poem begins with the lines,Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludgeThis gives the audience a picture of soldiers with heavy bags on their... ... victory.He seems to see the passage of arms as a battle that must happen in order forsomething good to devolve of it. He uses it was a famous victory a fewtimes at the end of verses, which he is determined to get across thepoint of this battle was worth fighting for, though he contradictshimself as he canno t explain what it is. Kaspar corrects Wilhelminewhen she states that it was a wicked thing and says that it was afamous victory.I get the whim that Robert Southey believes that good can comeof war, though he doesnt fully understand what the Battle of Blenheimwas about. I have come to the conclusion that Wilfred Owen is fullyagainst war and not prepared to change his mind, as he experiencedfirst-hand how tragic it can be. Southeys attitude towards war is onethat good can become of it, and Owen believes it is a awesome andtragic thing.

Compare the poems and comment on how the way Owen and Southey convey Es

Compare the poems and comment on how the way Owen and Southey convey their attitude to contendds war - Dulce et Decorum EstDulce et Decorum Est tells the story of how Wilfred Owen experiencesworld war first hand and tells of his bitter angst towards thegovernment who try to persuade young men to join the army.Owen authentic many of his poetic techniques at Craiglockhart MilitaryHospital where he spent much of the war as an injured sol analyser, and wasable to express his ideas and feelings on musical compositionHe uses the Latin phrase Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori, whichtranslates into it is sweet and glorious to die for ones country.Owen tells of how this phrase is wrong, how it is non glorious toexperience the harsh reality of war with the explosions and thescreeching of missiles, which he saw with his own eyes. The phrase isdeceptive to the men that are called up as they look to help theircountry and believe that it is something to die for.The poem begins with a slow r hythm through the use of heavy, longwords, in give to illustrate how slow and painstaking war was. Owensview on war is that it is a dangerous thing to do and using a Latinphrase is just a way of recruiting more troops. He states,My friend, you would not tell with such high zestThe old Lie Dulce et decorum estPro patria moriMy friend refers to another war poet, Jessie Pope, who had acompletely different aspect on war. Owen emphasises the word lie ashe fully believes that the phrase is one.The poem begins with the lines,Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through oozeThis gives the audience a picture of soldiers with heavy bags on their... ... victory.He seems to see the battle as a battle that must happen in order forsomething good to come of it. He uses it was a famous victory a fewtimes at the end of verses, which he is determined to get crossways thepoint of this battle was worth fighting for, though he contradictshimself as he cannot explain what it is. Kaspar corrects Wilhelminewhen she states that it was a wicked thing and says that it was afamous victory.I get the impression that Robert Southey believes that good can comeof war, though he doesnt fully understand what the Battle of Blenheimwas about. I have come to the conclusion that Wilfred Owen is fullyagainst war and not prepared to change his mind, as he experiencedfirst-hand how tragic it can be. Southeys attitude towards war is onethat good can bring of it, and Owen believes it is a terrible andtragic thing.

Play Critique Essay

The main idea of this play, The Voice of Turtles was finding truth and rest in love despite the difficulties. That sounds similar to the main idea of my 1st critiques play, Romeo & Juliet however compare to that, this play was lighter and softer. This play took its backing in the main character cranny Middletons (Kate Woodruff) flat in New York City, in 1943, and it was displayed sound through their comforts and passionate times in the apartment.There were three characters in the play fissure Middleton, Olive Lashbrooke, Bill Page. Sally Middleton was played by an actress named Kate Woodruff, and she was the only character who was in the beginning and the end. First, she started as a girl who had a little knowledge about functions in this world, but as she met Bill and spent more and more time with him, she began to profit certain things and eventually acknowledges her true love, Bill. Kate Woodruffs acting style expressing obtuseness and vulnerability perfectly fitted with S ally. However, Bill Page, who was performed by Jim Felton, was not developed good enough to capture the audience. I understood that Bill was the character who was optimistic and learned a divide through his experiences during the WWII, but he was not crisp enough to express that well-experienced soldier type of a guy.I could feel that he became more lovable and passionate towards the end, but it seemed like he didnt fully understand his character. But Olive Lashbrooke, who was played by Lisa Perez, was another well developed character. She was the only character who had a major switch in her attitude in the middle of the play because she had a suspicion about the birth between her friend Sally and ex-lover Bill. However, Lisa Perez does it really well with the consistent in the character by clearly displaying arrogant and flirtatious behaviors, and that consistent also gave reliability to the audience.The plot of play expanded with the timeline of late afternoon Friday to Sunday night, and although it was a short period of time, the story was comprehensibly displayed. It started with a basic idea that Bill and Olive were seeing each other, but Olive broke up with him at Sallys house when he comes over, so Olive left her house. Bill had no one to spend time with and Sally was available so two of them spent time together. Olive becamesuspicious about the relationship between Sally and Bill, so she visits Sally tries to win Bill back but Bill denies. Bill fell in love with Sally, who was unsure about the relationship. But Bill convinced her to work together in their relationship and Sally agrees at the end.Considering that happy end, there were few situations where it displayed opposite signs that their relationship might not work. There was a scene where Olive tried to interrupt the relationship between Sally and Bill, which caused Sally to think their relationship might be bad for her friendship with Olive. Also Sally was tired of promiscuous life and did n ot want to involve deeply with Bill. These situations made the play more appealing, which all worked out well at the end.The setting of the play, which was Sallys apartment, helped her character to be more understandable. As I mentioned above, in the beginning part of the play, Sally started as a girl who had a little knowledge about this world, and this apartment setting made it looked like she spends most of her time in her apartment. Also it was her apartment that created an environment to be comforter and more honest for Sally.There was an delirious change of Olive when she became suspicious about the relationship between Sally and Bill, and in the scene where she came back to win Bill back, Olive wore an awful skin clothes. In many plays and films, fur clothes are usually wore by greedy and deceptive women and that costume added more to Olives characteristic. It was an interesting thing to see because they were explaining her characteristic through costume rather than words. Just like Olives costume, all other features of the play worked together very well to support the play.For example, the light, which shined on Bills face when he looked out the window, was supposed to be the moonlight, and it was amazing. He could just act like he was face out the window, but when that light shined on his face, it just made me to think that I was in the apartment. Also the warm light on the set fix the apartment together and created a cozy feeling.I felt performances of Sally and Olive were great but not Bills performance. Most of the time, Sallyperformed by Kate Woodrufflooked comfortable and Ithink she intended to do that because the setting was her apartment. Her actions, such as the way she sit on her couch, cooking in the kitchen, and even her walks all seemed like what a woman in 20s would be at home. Also when she was listening to Sally and Bill axiom what happened outside of the apartment,which is this worldshe expressed her curiosity and interests with h er facial expressions such as her eyes getting bigger and blinking her eyes quickly. Those performances told us that she had a lot to experience and learn from this world.On the other hand, Oliveperformed by Lisa Perezexperienced a lot outside of the apartment, and used the high-pitched voice that helped her cocky and left over(p) character. However the performance of Billplayed by Jim Feltonwas not enough to express the character and generate interests. He was trying hard but I just could not sympathize with his lines. But overall, it was a good play. The audiences seats were so close to the stage and I really enjoyed being close to the characters.

July’s People Essay

Julys People is a story ab divulge the drastic change and upheaval of clubhouse caused by the ending of apartheid in S awayh Africa. Throughout the story the theme of conflict between colours and whites is brought up and explored. This theme of conflict is largely played out between Maureen, the white suburban render of three, and July, her servant and host during this time of upheaval in Johannesburg. While the two engage in conflicts doneout the intensity it isnt the type of conflict that is injurious to either party, it is the type which forces both sides to grow and evolve their opinions and out reflexion on society.Read muchgood mint David Foster Wallace essayThis change and evolution is seen mainly in Maureen who, over the course of the story, evolves and in the end is essentially reborn into a more learn version of herself as a result of the conflict which she goes through with July. At the onset of Julys People, all Maureen Smales has ever known is being a mother and wife. As the story progresses it becomes clear that she will shed this role and step into a version of herself vastly more complex and real than the one she leftfield behind.The longer Maureen is in the village, the less in match she is with the person she was back in Johannesburg. Along with losing touch with her experienced self, Maureen begins to discover things about her family that she did not sack up in the city, He left the smell of his sweaty sleep behind him she had not known, back there, what his smell was (the sweat of lovemaking is different, and mutual). Showers and baths kept away, for both of them, the possibility of penetrative in this kind of way. She had not known herself the odors that could be secreted by her own body. (p. 103).During this passage Maureen is using the stage of not knowing the natural odor of herself and her keep up as a metaphor to emphasize that back in the city everything pees covered up by cologne or otherwise, while in the village, whe re no(prenominal) of this disguise is available, the true smell, or nature of a person becomes clear. As Maureens old reality begins to slip away it leaves a gapping hole in its absence. The hole then needs to be filled, and this is where July and the conflict he brings comes into play. What Maureen learns about the dynamics of culture while talking to July is eventually what fills up the hole.From early on in the book, Maureen and July are in conflict with each other, butting heads on numerous topics including control of the Bakkie and Maureens role in the village. While this conflict may look counterproductive at first glance, it is actually providing both Maureen and July with valuable insight into each others thoughts and feelings of the current situation. As it becomes increasingly clear that Maureen is losing touch with who she was in the city, the reader begins to see Maureen struggling to understand July and the mentality of the people living in the village, -My, my, my.Wh at can we do. Is terrible, everybody coming very bad, killing burning totally God can help us. We can only hope everything will come back all right-. Maureen then goes on to say, -But you dont wet the way it was, you dont mean that. Do you? You dont mean that. -(p. 95). Here Maureen is taken aback at the fact that a black person might not want the social change that the end of apartheid would bring with it. This is a prime example of a white suburban woman being faced with a idea that doesnt fit into her categorization of the world and her struggling to understand this new and strange concept.The more that Maureen has these conflicting moments with July the more she begins to grow and move towards releasing her old ideas and prejudices, while adopting a new view of the world. The closer the story draws to its end the more Maureen is seen letting go of her old self and adopting new ideas in their place. For Maureen, the gun that Bam brought with him is her very last link to her li fe back in the city, when it is stolen Maureen tries desperately to get Julys help to get it back, pleading with July, Youve got to get that gun back. (p. 149). Maureen is clinging to the last link she has to her past self, trying to hold on to the smallest bit of normalcy and having the gun ripped away from her brings all that crashing to the ground. For Maureen, the crowning(prenominal) moment of letting go occurs just after the gun is stolen following a conversation with July, The skin of her body was creeping with and ecstatic fever of relief, smart as a whip and despicable to her. (p. 153).This passage is Maureens way of expressing her release of her old self. The use of the word fever here is a clue to what is going on, the body uses a fever to kill off an illness by overheating it, and now Maureen is having the part of her that is connected with Johannesburg killed off. The despicable yet splendid feeling that this gives her symbolizes how horrible and hard it is to let he r past go but also how good it feels to be ready to move freely into the future.Once Maureen was ready to move on it just took the right situation and the arrival of the helicopter was just that situation, She is running to the river and she hears them, the mans voice and the voices of children speaking English somewhere to the left. But she makes bully for the ford, and pulling off her shoes balances and jumps from boulder to boulder, and when there are no more boulders does as she has seen done, moves out into the water like some member of a baptismal sect to be born again(p. 159).This passage encompasses both Maureen leaving behind her old self as well as her abject forward to be re-born into a new person. This is the moment when Maureens journey comes full circle. She was prepared for this moment of rebirth by way of her numerous conflicts with July, through which she grew greatly as a person. As the story evolves and Maureen begins to realize that she and her family are not t he same people they were back in Johannesburg, she finds herself in conflict with July and his persuasion more and more.These conflicts, which existed in her, were not so much those of racial equality but rather of personal identity. By way of her discussions with July, Maureen is able to sort out the issue of personal identity and trans make up herself into a born again person by the end of the book. While these discussions often take on the form of a conflict they are conflict which leads to growth, not to destruction. The conflict that she has with July over the course of the story is essential to Maureen becoming the free, reborn version of herself and to discover who she is alfresco of apartheid.

Explain religious teaching about what it means to be a human Essay

Hu cosmos has a embodied spirit who thinks, act, speaks and desires. Religious teachings say that humans argon created in the image of god. They are different from animals because humans pack the ability to love, be clean and have free will. Humans life is a gift from god. We must value life. divinity created us as intelligent beingnesss with the ability to control our actions, urges and emotions.Christian teaches that free will is given by God. By free will, we plaster cast our profess lives. Bible says Humans are creation of God. God desired humans to exist. God gave us the ability to reason, speak and to live a moral life. Humans are mixture of humanity and divine breath. Bible teaches that we are the incarnation of the divine and part of us is drawn from the earth. Everything created by god is meliorate and it was intended. Of all the creatures in Gods creation, Humans are the only ones who enter into a dialouge with God which is by prayer. Most christians believe that humans are distinct from the animal word, and that the most important differences between animals and humans have is soul a divine spark that sets them apart from other living things. This asserts that Christians do not treat animals as their equals, as only humans were made in the image of God. Christians believe in the sanctity of life, that there is something special and holy about life.Christians believe that humans have a soul which lives on after the body has died, this soul will then be judged and then goat join God in heaven. God gave humans dominion all over the non-human life, E.g. in Genesis Let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the billet suggesting human life has a higher value than non-human life, this shows God has given humans a big responsibility to life which exempliflies the value.God made man in his image many christians believe that God gave them the brains and the abilities to find cures for humans by experimenting on animals and not to use these abilities would be denying Gods excogitate for them. Some christians say that this gives them the right to use animals inexperiments because humans are of more value. As well in Genesis God said to turn Rule Over all living creatures suggesting animal testing is acceptable. However, Some christians may be very much against this, as when God created the world, he byword that all that was in was good. Some say this means we should not experiment on animals because they are wonderful part of Gods creation. The earth is the Lords and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it.Human lives are special because it is a gift from God. Human lives distinct from any other creatures and are in higher positions. Humans have sanctity which relates to their dignity, which has both natural dimension, in terms of rational thought and moral decision-making powers.Human beings have complete control over their own life and destiny. (15 marks) How far might a religious believer agr ee with this statement?Everyone has a purpose of being in this universe because we all have a special position that is created by God. Humans take form their own choices and lead on their life. But, God is incessantly there to show people the right path. Only God has control over peoples lives. He decides when we die and when we born. Everything is in Gods hand as religious believer will say God created the world. Gods choices are always right. He is capable of carrying out any project to a successful conclusion without the possibility of fault or failure. Nothing in His universe happens by chance or accident. For every effect there is a cause. God is in control. We have freedom to choose within the constraints of who we are and the circumstances we find ourselves in. Yet while God controls those circumstances but does not control us. While God is able to control us, and if he wanted to he could override our freedom, he chooses not to.The concept of the control of God over everyth ing is called the sovereignty of God. Nothing gives us strength and confidence like an understanding of the sovereignty of God in our lives. Gods sovereignty is defined as His complete and total independent control over every creature, event, and circumstance at every moment in history. Subject to none, influenced bynone, absolutely independent, God does what He pleases. God is in complete control of every molecule in the universe at every moment, and everything that happens is either caused or allowed by Him for His own perfect purposes. Religious believer might say that God is directing your steps down to the smallest details. He can make things happen that you could never make happen on your own. He is for you, on your side, and what He has purposed for your life will come to pass.

Chloe’s Story

Which serous membrane in Chloes abdomen most likely contains the greatest adipose tissue? The peritoneum is the largest serous membrane of the form which contains the greater omentum, the largest peritoneal fold. The greater omentum normally contains a considerable amount of adipose tissue. The adipose tissue content can greatly expand with free weight gain, giving rise to a characteristic beer belly seen in some individuals. B. What involuntary muscle process initiated by deglutition of water may spring Chloe pain?Swallowing is the involuntary contraction of pharyngeal muscles which sets peristalsis begins with coordinated contractions and relaxation of muscles in the esophagus and into the stomach, where she just had procedure. C. Why might reduction of the size of Chloes stomach reduce her acid reflux? The stomach empties quicker, due to the bypass of the duodenum where the most, if not all the churning takes place with digestive enzymes that could force the sphincter to lanc e the reflux. D. How will protein digestion be affected by Chloes surgery?The proteins would be flushed out of the body quicker than usual with the high vulnerability of malabsorption. Normally, pepsin begins the enzymatic digestion of the ingested proteins they linger in the stomach longer than most of the ingested food with the end result of gastric protein digestion is a chyme of mostly polypeptides and some free amino acids to be absorbed in to the body. Pancreatic Protease digests protein in the basic environment of the small intestine. E. Which pancreatic enzymes would Chloe need to breakdown the fats in her nutritional drink?Lipase working with bile excreted from the liver breaking down fat molecules. F. Why might Chloe be at risk for gallstones (crystallized cholesterol which can block the flow of bile from the gallbladder)? A change in diet, no longer consuming high fatty and high cholesterol laden foods. Rapid weight loss. The gall bladder aid in the digestion and absorp tion of fats in the duodenum which is no longer being used. G. Would absorption of nutrients be substantially altered in the small intestine by-line Chloes gastric bypass surgery? Why or why not?Yes, absorption is greatly affected chase the gastric bypass surgery. The cadence the food stays in the body is severely limited, along with the additional malabsorption of important vitamins and nutrients will change. H. Why is vitamin B12 inadequacy a serious concern? Vitamin B12 deficiency impairs the bodys ability to make blood, accelerates blood cell destruction, and damages the nervous system resulting in possible irreversibility. I. With which complications should Chloe be concerned following the surgery? Not to overeat ingesting too much food could overly stretch damaging the reduced stomach.J. Why is monitoring nutrition so important to Chloe flat? The digestion has been permanently altered digestion and absorption of nutrients have been compromised. Vitamin supplements must be taken to aid with the body maintaining homeostasis. K. Chloe went on a liquid diet immediately following her surgery. Based on what you have learned about nutrition in this chapter, which substances would you include in a liquid diet? My diet would include demand vitamins and minerals including all four food groups. There are many amino acids that cannot replicate other than the body produces them.

Othello †English Exam Essay

Othello is a tragedy written by Shakespeare in 1602. The main pillow slip, Othello is a popular general in the town of Venice. He move for the young Desdemona and all goes well for a while, until Othello promotes Cassio instead of Iago. This causes Iago to become jealous and he plots a malicious plan to make Othello unhappy. He manipulates different race into getting them to do what they want Emilia who is Iagos wife steals a croakkerchief for him. The handkerchief re piddles an important differentiate in the play as Othello gave it to Desdemona as a token of his mania.Desdemona treasures the handkerchief provided mistakenly leaves it behind one day this is when Emilia steals it. Once Iago has the handkerchief his entire plan falls into place. He puts the idea that Desdemona is having an affair with Cassio in Othellos head, and then places the handkerchief on Cassio. At first Othello is so in love with Desdemona that he prizes nothing of it, but once he sees that Cassio had the token of love he gave to her, he thinks differentlyAfter being left heartbroken, he confronts Desdemona and eventually suffocates her to death. The innocent Emilia comes in to find her mistress murdered, she then reveals the truth that Iago was behind all the lies which is when Iago comes in and kills her. Othello then kills himself divulge of guilt. A monologue is give care a monologue as it is a paragraph spoken on pose alone nevertheless it is just a short speech. A Soliloquy is virtually what a temperament is doing or thinking or it could just be about what is happening in the play at that time.In Othello Iago is the character that says most of the soliloquies, he duologue about his plans to undermine Othello and how he can predict everyones reactions. Directly before Iagos first soliloquy, Roderigo and Iago talk about going to war in Cyprus and Iago manipulates Roderigo into doing what he wants by persuading him that Desdemona give tire of Othello eventually and s he allow foring then fall in love with Roderigo. He does this because he knows that Roderigo is in love with Desdemona however he knows that Othello and Desdemona are happily in love and would never tire of each other.In spiel 1, word-painting 3, Iagos first soliloquy is about what he plans to do, he explains that by telling Othello lies he will get exactly what he wants. This is for Othello to be unhappy. He alike explains that by doing this he will get Cassios job therefore he will be killing 2 birds with one stone. In this soliloquy he mentions a rumor, twixt my sheets, /hes done my self-assurance. by this he means that he thinks Othello has slept with Emilia but he doesnt know if its true or not. This is the just now line in the play that suggests a reason behind Iagos plans and why he hates Othello so much. nevertheless by using the word office to refer to his wife, Emilia Shakespeare gives the interview the impression he doesnt care for her much. I also know this as h e uses her later in the play to make his plans against Othello work out he also kills her at the end of the play. Iago then goes onto say, I know not ift be true/ and I, for mere suspicion in that kind, / will do as if for surety. Iago is look, even though he doesnt know if its true or not, hes going to get back at Othello anyway.Therefore he could just be using this as an excuse for his plans, as this would make the hearing see him not as evil but as unhappy and wanting revenge which would make them sympathetic for him. However, as this seems like a transit for his for his evil plan, again it is clear that he doesnt really care about Emilia. Shakespeare gives Iago the line, He holds me well, the better shall my declare oneself work upon him. I think that Shakespeare does this to constitute that because Iago thinks very highly of himself Othello will too, and never suspect that he is telling him lies, and that he will always trust him.He also uses the word purpose which seems like he is trying to the audience, this is what he has to do, like it is his purpose to bring Othello down. Shakespeare also shows that Iago hates Othello by undermining him, for example Iago says, I hate the Moor. By using the term, tie down this is being racist, however a Shakespearean audience would not become seen this as racism as it was not widely recognized in those times. However Iago knew that by saying this it would be an insult to Othello.He then goes on to say, Will be as tenderly led by the nose as asses are when he says this he is referring to Othello as a dumb puppet, this is called Animal Imagery, by doing this a Shakespearean audience would see him as more of an animal and therefore this would lessen their respect for him. Iago is saying that because Othello is so dumb and trustworthy of Iago, he will do exactly what Iago wants him to. He will be tardily tricked into thinking that Desdemona is having an affair. The last two lines of the soliloquy are, I havet . It is engendered. Hell and night / must bring this monstrous birth to the worlds light.These two sentences stand out because they are a rhyming couplet unlike the rest of the soliloquy. The rhyming couplet, Night and Light could make you think of a event of different things, for example opposites, comparing the good characters to the bad characters. It could also be a representation of Othello and Desdemona referring to their skin color, emphasizing how different they are. All these things would make the audience think more deeply into how different some of the characters in the play are, for example Iago and Othello or Desdemona and Emilia.The word engendered means created and when Iago says this he is talking about his sneaky plan to bring Othello down. By saying this, the audience will think he has just thought of his plan at this point, however he had in truth already come up with his plan. He also says the line, monstrous birth to the worlds night. first of all by using th e word, monstrous it stands out because this is quite an angry word however he says this in a calm manner, however because of the type of word he uses it could lead the audience to think about how each of the characters that Iago is betraying may feel after Iagos plan has taken place.In Act 3, Scene 3 the most important part of the play takes part, and that is when Iago receives the handkerchief from Emilia who has stolen it from Desdemona. Without this Iagos plan would not work as Othello seeing the Handkerchief that he gave to Desdemona as a token of their love in Cassios hand is what leads him to believe that she has been unfaithful. Iagos soliloquy from Act 3, Scene 3 is about what he plans to do now he has the handkerchief he also mentions how important it is and that without it his malicious plan would not work.This particular soliloquy is also written as a poem, I know this because the root of each line has a capital letter, And Let Him find it. Shakespeare does this becau se it makes the soliloquy stand out from the rest of the play. This is probably one of the most important and trenchant soliloquy from the play as it tells you a lot about Iagos character. Iagos first line of the soliloquy is, I will in Cassios lodging lose this napkin, / and let him find it. In other words Iago is saying he is going to slyly place the handkerchief in Cassios room so he will find it yet never know that it was Iago who placed it there. This is a vital part of Iagos plan because by planting the handkerchief on Cassio, Othello will see that he has it and automatically think that Desdemona gave it to him, if he didnt do this then Othello would never believe that Desdemona has been having an affair. This wouldnt have a dramatic effect on the audience as they would already expect Iago to say this from the first soliloquy in Act, 1 Scene 3.Iago then goes onto say, Trifles light as air/ are to the jealous confirmations strong which basically means that even though the hand kerchief is a small peanut object that would normally make no difference what so ever, if Iago is careful and he uses it at the right time. Everything will fall into place and his plan will work out perfectly. By, Jealous confirmations strong he means that because Othello is slightly jealous to begin with, once he sees the handkerchief in Cassios hand and is tricked in to think theyre having an affair, he will be even more jealous.The next line of the soliloquy is, As proofs of holy writ Iago is saying that he is certain that the handkerchief will definitely do something, and he is using religion to back himself up. Shakespeare does this on purpose as a Shakespearean audience would immediately believe Iago, religion was an important thing in those days there for if Iago uses this to back up his plan, and they would also think it is important too. Shakespeare ends the soliloquy with the line, Burn Like mines of sulfur.I did say so. this is simile, it is used to describe exactly h ow Othello will react to the constant lies he is being fed without realizing, he will start to believe everything Iago tells him. The way he says, I did say so. makes him sound like he has a very high opinion of himself, almost like he is describing himself as god-like. I think he is also referring to what he said before, when he says that he hates Othello. Through out Othello Shakespeare wrote Iagos soliloquies about his shifty plans to undermine Othello, to do this he used spectral imagery which is when you say something about religion to symbolize something else.In Othello religious imagery is used when Iago talks about creating his plan, Hell and night by saying hell he could be referring to the devil which makes me think of Iago as he is evil and devious. He also says in Act 3 Scene 3, I did say so by saying this it is almost as if he is describing himself as god-like. Shakespeare used religious imagery because it has the potential to change a Shakespearean audiences mind a bout the story. It would attract them more than it would a modern audience.All by means of the play, soliloquies are used to let you know what is going on inside the characters mind. Iagos soliloquies help the audience understand Iagos character it also helps them realize his motives for everything he does during the play. There are a few different reasons behind Iagos devious plans. We see this through the two soliloquies from Act 1 Scene 3 and Act 3 scene 1. Shakespeare uses a lot of dramatic irony in his plays through all the soliloquies which are spoken.The strongest spot of dramatic irony used in the play is that the audience know exactly what is happening, for example Desdemona is innocent and that it is Iago who his twisting things and telling lies. Where as Othello has no idea, he thinks that Iago is trustworthy and that Desdemona is guilty of having an affair. Dramatic irony is exciting and it makes the audience feel like part of the story. Throughout the play, Shakespear e uses irony to add humor, suspense and tension.Overall soliloquies have a drastic impact on the play as not only do they explain what characters mainly Iago are thinking, but they also create an atmosphere in the audience. Soliloquies make the audience guess what it going to happen next in the play, and because there are so many of them it also gets their attention. other reason why soliloquies have a good impact on the play is because it makes it more interesting having just one person on stage talking to themselves or the audience instead of having two or more people having a conversation between them selves.

Philosophy of life Essay

NAGAPPAN SETHURAMAN existentialist philosophy as a philosophy is historically and culturally of European roue. Ever since it was recognised as the dominating philosophy of the West in the midtwentieth century, it has left its impact on literature which has both been substantial and significant (Chatterji 10). Existentialism does non offer a set of doctrines or a single philosophy system. It has been diversely defined and interpreted by various thinkers over the years.As a result, as a philosophy, existentialism by its very nature defies and abhors systematisation (Ahmad 10). Nevertheless, it is possible to identify authentic traits of this school of thought. All the existentialists emphasize the vastness of the individual as well as his freedom and responsibility for being what he is (Das 423). In their essay to describe mans existence and its conflicts, the origin of its conflicts, and the anticipation of overcoming them (Ahmad 13), existentialists focus their attention on certain aspects of human existence.Srivastava enumerates them as follows b) it is never safe and ever at the mercy of chance, c) it is full of suffering, of virtuoso concoction or other, d) it is full of conflict, e) it is rotted in guilt, f) it can non escape from the nett situation of death (185). These tenets of existentialism have been widely reflected in the literature of the world since the approach of Sartre who established an interaction between literature and philosophy in his writings. John Macquarrie sums up the essence of existentialism as, On the whole, it has been the tragic sense of spirit that has been customary among the existentialists (Macquarrie 164).Almost all great writers of the hand generation have handled the doctrines of existentialism in their works. This is the main soil why mans alienation, dread, s untowardiness, bad faith, responsibility, shipment to freedom, anguish ar the very hallmarks of 20th century literature (Ahmad 5). As a novelist, A nita Desai exhibits a strong inclination towards the existentialist interpretation of the human troth. In particular, she voices the mute miseries and helplessness of married women tormented by existentialist problems and troths (Prasad 139).A woman novelist, Desai has won a niche by exploring the emotional world of women, legal transfer to light the various deeper forces at work in feminine sensibility as well as psychology. This predilection leads her to examine the psyche of her women protagonists when they argon confronted with the absurdity of deportment. This draws her attention to the darker side of flavor. She projects a tragic vision in her novels by placing her female protagonists in hostile situations. Desai further examines her women protagonists as individuals who find themselves forced into out or keeping(p) environss, fighting against the odds.This problem of the The Indian Review of humanity literature in English, Vol. 1, No. I Jan, 2005 tragic tension betwe en the individual and their unfavourcapable environment acquires the dimensions of existential angst. Starting from her outset novel Cry the Peacock to the latest Baumgartners Bombay, all her novels highlight the existentialists predilection for portraying the predicament of man. Many critics have traced shades of existentialist thought in the novel of Anita Desai. Time and again her stems and characters have been interpreted in the light of existential philosophy.In this regard it has been pointed out Desais chief concern is human relationship. Her central theme is she existential predicament of an individual, which she projects finished incompatible couples- very sensitive wives and ill matched husbands. She is a minute observer and perceives everything mutely, minutely and delicately. Whenever she creates a poetical situation, she gives it a perfect poetic treatment to every detail (Singh 12) Anita Desais characters are self-aware of the reality around them and they carry a s ense of loneliness, alienation and pessimism.She adds a new-made dimension turning inward into the realities of breeding and plunges into the deep-depths of the human psyche to punctuate out its mysteries and chaos in the minds of characters. Particularly Fire on the Mountain has been identified as the lyrical fictionalization of the quintessence of existentialism (Gupta 185). A confining study of the texture and theme of the novel in relation to the tenets of existentialism justifies the above observation. It has been noted that Fire on the Mountain displays skillful dramatisation of experiences of certain women embroiled by the cross way of sustenance (Choudhury 77).This novel deals with the existential angst experienced by the female protagonist Nanda Kaul, an old lady living in isolation. It also projects the inner turmoil of a small girl, Raka, who is haunted by a sense of futility. Thirdly, it presents the betrothal of a helpless woman, Ila Das who is in conflict with forces that are too powerful to be encountered, resulting in her tragic death. Thus, the existential themes of solitude, alienation, the futility of human existence and struggle for survival form the major themes of the novel.Fire on the Mountain falls into trey partitions, each further divided into several short chapters of unequal length. The first section titled Nand Kaul at Carignano runs into ten chapters. This section deals with Nanda Kaul, the main protagonists lonely life in Kasauli. Raka comes to Carignano forms the second section and it contains twenty one chapters. It portrays Nanda Kauls change of attitude towards Raka, her great granddaughter. The final section Ila Das leaves Carignano is divided into thirteen chapters. This section presents the tragic end of Ila Da, Nanda Kauls childishness friend.In all, the book runs to 145 pages. The structural unity, as suggested by the section captions is offered by Carignano, Nanda Kaul and Raka, running counter to one some o ther complemented by that of Ila Das also provide unity of structure. Like the other works of Anita Desai, the present novel contains neither any story value nor events that are interesting by themselves. The entire novel revolves round the existential angst experienced by the women protagonists. In this novel, the story element is very thin and thither is practically no action except for the tragic end (Indira 96).The story revolves round the inner lives of the ii female protagonists, Nand Kaul and Raka. Nanda Kaul is the wife of Mr. Kaul, the Vice-Chancellor of the Punjab University. When the novel begins, Nanda The Indian Review of World books in English, Vol. 1, No. I Jan, 2005 Kaul is living in Carignano, far from the madding crowd. She is leading a life of isolation and introspection. She shuns all human company. Even the postmans arriver to deliver the letter is frowned upon by her. But this seeming quietude does not last long.Raka arrives at Carignano to convalesce after her typhoid attack. The old woman and the young girl live in double singleness. But as geezerhood pass by, Nanda Kaul finds herself drawn towards Raka, something she had not expected. But the small girl refuses to be befriended and escapes into the hills looking for company in solitude. Ila Das, Nanda Kauls childhood friend lectures Carignano to meet Raka. A one time lecture in the Punjab University, Ila Das had lost her job subsequent to Mr. Kauls retirement. She has come to Kasauli now in her new capacity as an officer in the social welfare department.She fights against child marriage by enlightening the local people about the evils of this practice. This invites the wrath of many of the villagers of whom Preet Singh is one. His attempts to barter his little daughter for a tiny piece of disgrace and a few goats have been successfully thwarted by Ila Das. He is lying in waitress to settle his score with her. wizard evening, when Ila Das returns late from Carignano to her hum ble house in the valleys, he waylays her, rapes and murders her. When the news of Ila Dass death is conveyed to Nand Kaul over the phone, she is discourteously shocked and falls dead.Raka unaware of her great grand suffers death, rushes into the house proclaiming wildly that she has set the forest of rouse. Nanda Kaul, Raka and to some extent Ila Das, are embodiments of the existential predicament experienced by the individual in an un-understanding and even hostile universe. A detailed examination of the characters of these protagonists brings to light how Anita Desai has succeeded in giving expression to her existentialist world-view through these characters and by a subtle use of vision and symbols. When the novel begins, Nand Kaul is presented as a recluse.Living all alone, except for the company of the servants who dare not plump up her privacy, she brooks no human presence. She wanted no one and nothing else. Whatever else came, or happened here, would be unwelcome intrusi on and distraction(FM 3). She spends her days in isolation, musing about her past and experiencing the existential ennui. From the musings of her agitated mind it appears that as the wife of the vicechancellor for the Punjab University and the mother of several children, she has lived a very busy and tiring life (Raizada 44).Anita Desai unfurls her past in the form of long interior monologues punctuated by authorial interruptions, Nanda Kaul had witnessed only betrayals and demands in life before her retirement to Kasauli. She had lived a monotonous life receiving and treating the endless stream of visitors who used to call on her vice-chancellor husband. Her husband had carried on a life-long affair with his mathematics mistress Miss David, whom he would have married, had she not been a Christian. Again, the memories of her children make Nanda Kaul shudder at the very thought of her past.As a mother of several children, all demanding and unaccommodative, she had been given too many anxious(predicate) moments. Now all alone in Carignano, a house associated with many weird stories, Nanda Kaul feels that loneliness is the only essential condition of human life. Whenever she looks at the tall(a) pine trees that stand out from among the underwood, she is reminded of her own alienation. Not exactly conscious of what she is waiting for, nonetheless, she is awaiting the inevitable end to all human existence death.She is haunted by the existential angst which has led her to conclude that human life is basically a lonely struggle against the odds of life. In her case the odds have manifested themselves in the form of an adulterous husband and cantankerous children. Strongly convinced The Indian Review of World Literature in English, Vol. 1, No. I Jan, 2005 that life and dealt a raw deal to her, she has resolved to find the substance, if any, of her existence in isolation. She treasures her freedom, her privacy, glad her responsibilities towards her family are over, glad she needs nobody and nobody now needs her (Krishnaswamy 260).This has colourful her outlook on life to a large extent. Her reaction to the arrival of the postman and Raka, her invalid great granddaughter, makes it appear that she has become a misanthrope. But the law seems to be that she is a sensitive person preoccupied with the real nature of her existence as opposed to the illusory life of her past as a vice-chancellors wife and mother to children. If Nanda Kaul was a recluse out of vengeance for a long life of duty and obligation, her great grand daughter was a recluse by nature, by instinct.She had not arrived at this condition by a long route of rejection and sacrifice kindred Nanda Kaul, she was born to it, simply (FM 48). Desais above observation about Rakas character at once brings out the similarity and difference with that of Nanda Kauls in their mental make up. Rakss characters has been introduced by the novelist as a foil to Nanda Kauls. If Nanda Kaul symbolises a particular aspect of existentialism, which is examined elsewhere in this chapter, Raka epitomises another aspect of the existential predicament the influence of her parents on her life.Anita Desai makes Raka both young temperamentally and solitude-loving. When Raka is first introduced, the reader is informed that she is the granddaughter of Asha, the most problematic of Nanda Kauls daughters. That she is an unwelcome intruder into Nanda Kauls life is suggested by an image. As Nanda Kaul first looks at her greatgrand daughter who is walking towards her, she reminds the old lady of an insect Raka slowed blue, dragged her foot, then came towards her great grandmother with something despairing in her attitude..She moody a pair of lavishly large and somewhat bulging eyes about in a way that made the old lady feel more than ever her similarity to an insect. (FM 39). However, the old lady is shocked to see the pale and gaunt little girl and is moved to pity. But to Nanda Kaul she wa s still an intruder, an outsider, a mosquito flown up from the plains to tease and come to (FM 40). Raka herself does not bother much about the blatant lack of warmth(FM 40) exhibited by her great grandmother. She prefers to stay away from company. Like a wild physical newly caged, she keeps prowling barefoot in her room, looking at the stone heaps.She is not interested in flowers or playing as children of her age normally melt down to do. By using two reptile images successively in a span of two pages, and by a suggestive hint about Rakas lack of interest in play and flowers, Desai impliedly establishes that there is something weird about her. Soon through several interior monologues enacted in Rakas subconscious mind, the reason for the abnormality in her is unfolded. The daughter of an ill-matched couple, Raka has been witness to the brutality and futility of human existence.She is haunted by the recollections of the nightmarish nights that have made her almost a child-stoic. Somewhere poop them, behind it all was her father, home from a party, stumbling and crashing through the curtains of the night, his mouth opening to let out a flood of rotten stench, beating at her mother with hammers and fists of abuse- common, filthy abuse that made Raka cower under her bedclothes and wet her mattress in fright, feeling the stream of urine warm and weakening between her legs like a stream of blood, and her mother lay down on the floor and shut her eyes and wept.Under her The Indian Review of World Literature in English, Vol. 1, No. I Jan, 2005 feet, in the dark, Raka felt that flat, wet jelly of her mothers being squelching and quivering, so that she didnt know where to put her feet and wept as she tried and true to get free of it. Ahead of her,no longer on the ground but at some distance now, her mother was crying. Then it was a jackal crying. (FM 72) The jerky shift from the interior monologue about her bitter past to the present observation of the jackal cr ying, the latter superimposed on the former brings out Rakas predicament.By doing this, the novelist likens the haunting memories to the crying jackals. So Rakas life is a close encounter with things that are wild and frightful- be it the memories of her mother beaten to frame by a drunkard father or the chilling cry of the jackals. Instead of trying to escape from this harsh and unnerving experiences and memories, Raka goes farther and deeper into them as if to voice the bottom of such wild realities.After some initial hesitation, she ventures deep down the ravine to the Monkey Point- a place not frequented by others and from where the cries of the jackals are comprehend No one ever came here but Raka and the cuckoos that sand invisibly. These the cuckooswere not the dutiful domestic birds that called Nanda Kaul to attention at Carignano. They were the demented birds that raved and beckoned Raka on to a land where there was no sound, only silence, no light, only shade, and skele tons kept in beds of ash on which the footprints of jackals flowered in gray.(FM 90) This passage effectively coveys Rakas plight and significance. She is at once a little girl with a splintered psyche and an unmistakable symbol of the individuals quest for meaning. The jackals are symbols of the mystery of life and Rakas walk to the Monkey Point is emblematic of her search for something unknown, yet inevitable and indispensable. Not all children would dare to brave the rough terrains of the ravines and impending peril of the jackals. Similarly, not all human beings are conscious of the futility of human existence nor are they in search of newer set.The existential theme of quest for meaning undertaken by those who refuse to remain merely as members of the multitude is well brought out in the lonely and mystified wanderings of Raka. In this respect it has been pointed out by Shantha Krishnaswamy Her Rakas childhood has hardened her into a little core of solitary self-sufficiency and now, a young girl up here in the mountains.. her spirit is defiant bounteous to go chanting I dont care, I dont care, I cant care of anything (FM 73). The conventional sweet smells and sounds of maidhood are ignored, she feels drawn by scenes of devastation and failure.The forest stimulates tingle her and she bursts from the shell of Carignano like a sharp, cutting edged explosive to set fire to the mountainside. (Krishnaswamy 261, 262) The utmost part of the foregoing observation concerning Rakas predilection for the forest fires needs elaborate analysis for it has symbolic overtones. Ever since her arrival at Carignano, Raka evinces a keen interest in wild fire. This obsession with the forest fire provides yet another dimension with the forest fire provides to her existentialist preoccupations.Immediately after her arrival at Carignano, on witnessing a fire in the forest she becomes obsessed with forest fires for they seem to her the empirical manifestation of her inner c onflict whether to continue with her average and painful and aimless existence imposed upon her by heredity and environment or to revolt against their dictates and attempt to create her own values. The Indian Review of World Literature in English, Vol. 1, No. I Jan, 2005 By an elaborate expression of her free will and demonstration of her ability to choose and act, she sets the forest on fire towards the end of the novel.The fire created by her is the result and manifestation of her existential angst to destroy the old and meaningless to make room for the new and significant. It is an affirmation of her search for values in an otherwise sleeveless existence. Ila Das is the third female protagonist of the novel. Unlike Nanda Kaul and Raka who are central to the story, her role is only marginal. Nonetheless, Anita Desai has projected yet another aspect of the existentialist philosophy through her character. Her life suggests another dimension of misery and meaningless existence (Je na 30).She is first introduced to the readers, when she calls Nanda Kaul on the phone and informs her of her intended visit to Kasauli to meet Raka. She speaks in a hideous voice (FM 21) and is rather plain in her looks. Through a long interior monologue in Nanda Kauls mind, the readers are informed of her past. She was Nanda Kauls childhood friend. She had also served in the university as a lecturer, thanks to Nanda Kauls good offices. But soon after the death of Mr. Kaul she had been ousted and had struggled a lot before finding the present employment as a social welfare officer.A poverty stricken loner of blue-blooded of child marriage, a practice rampant among the tribals. This lands her in an unenviable situation. She finds herself fighting a lonely battle against a mindless multitude. But she is not cowed down by adversity. She remains steadfast in her conviction and refuses to make any compromises. Though she is aware of the dire consequences that she might be forced to enco unter, she remains true to her cause. She succeeds in stooping several such child-marriage, the prominent one being the marriage of Preet Singhs seven year old daughter.Sustaining herself on a insufficient pay and putting up with the inevitable condition of loneliness, she wages a valiant battle against the dictates of the society. Finally, she pays a dear price for her convictions and refusal to compromise. She is raped and murdered by Preet Singh who has been dying for revenge. Though Ila Das plays a minor role in the novel, she is also an allegorical figure. She not only lives in isolation but also braves the brute majority with conviction and commitment as her tools.True, she meets with a tragic end but has made her existence significant in exhibiting courage and decision in the face of stiff resistance and threat to life. Her real involvement in peoples welfare assumes tremendous symbolic significance (Jena 30). She epitomises the existentialist concept of struggle against th e odds of life. For the existentialist, man is never just part of the cosmos but always stands to it in a relationship of tension with possibilities of tragic conflict (Macquarrie 17).She stands for the thinking individual who dares to exercise her free will and act according to her choice rather than submit meekly to the odds of life. The mindless tribal society in general, and Preet Singh in particular, represent the malevolent aspect to human existence-forces that are bent upon thwarting the individuals purpose and undoing her. One of the many ways of defining tragedy sees it as a clash between the aspiration of human freedom and creativity with a cosmic indian lodge that is stronger and defeats man (Macquarrie 189).Though Ila Das loses her chastity and life in the process of her struggle with such brute forces, her life has nonetheless become meaningful by virtue of the fact that she chooses a cause, fights for it and sacrifices herself in trying to accomplish her task. An exam ination of the use of symbolism and imagery in the novel proves beyond doubt the novelists existential concern. She portrays a tragic world where no compromises are made, no epiphanies are exploded, to be totally destroyed, as the The Indian Review of World Literature in English, Vol. 1, No.I Jan, 2005 sensitive, the visionary suffer nothing but suffocation and oppression. So, the content of the novel is sheer violence. The lives of the principal characters are unloved and unlived. (Indira 95,96). In keeping with this concept, Anita Desai resorts to the effective employment of imagery and symbolism in Fire on the Mountain. Her predilection for prey-predator imagery abounds in this novel also. Images of ugliness, loneliness, destruction and annihilation are consistently used in order to reflect the existential tone of the novel.An atmosphere of solitary introspection is created with the help of several images. For example, when she receives a call from Ila Das, Nanda Kual turned her head this way and that in an escape. She watched the white hen drag out a worm inch by resisting inch from the ground till it snapped in two. She felt like the worm herself, she winced at its mutilation (FM 21). The same is continued in the next page also Still depressing at the hen which was greedily gulping down bits of worm, she thought of her husbands face and the way he would plait his fingers across his stomach (FM 22).This prey-predator image of hen pecking at a worm is suggestive of Nanda Kauls present inner turmoil. Her past suffering at the hands of the adulterous husband and her present awareness about the harsh realities of life are both successfully established by this image. Another important image employed recurrently is that of the pine tree that stands burnt and alone, which is ofttimes an object of attraction for Nanda Kaul She was grey, tall and thin she fancied she could merge with the pine tree and be mistaken for one. To be a tree, no more and no less, was prepared to undertake(FM 4).Again, this image also contributes to the existentialist theme of the novel. Nandas sense of identification with the pine trees suggests her desire for absolute stillness and withdrawal from life(Indra 97). The image of the charred pine tree is repeatedly employed in the novel. Raka is reminded of the futility of existence while she looks at the lonely hills and charred pine trees This hill, with its one destroyed house and one unbuilt one, on the ridge under the fire-singed pines, appealed to Raka There was something about it- illegitimate, uncompromising and lawless.The sense of devastation and failure drew her, inspired her (FM 90). Images of insects like lizards, birds like eagles and parrots, and the thematic image of the fire with its connotations of violence and urgency occur at regular intervals, warning the reader of the impending tragedy (Indira 96). The critic S. Indira sums up the significance of imagery in Fire on the Mountain quoting D. H. Lawrence and the novelist herselfIt is the charming mosaic of imagery woven so skillfully by the novelist that makes the Novel a work of art. Quoting D. H.Lawrence who express If I eat an apple, I like to eat it with my senses, Anita Desai herself stated that the novel in which she attempted this closeness of man and beast, earth and vegetable was Fire on the Mountain. Imagery alone makes it possible and, in the process, the novel gains a richer texture and greater depth. As a critic says, this novel deprived of its imagery, would be an flagitious skeleton, chilling the reader The significant house imagery, the images of plants, colour, atmosphere and moon- all contribute to the textual density and symbolic centrality of the novel.(Indira 96) Another important aspect of this novels narrative technique is its symbolism. There are several symbols that deepen the philosophic implications of The Indian Review of World Literature in English, Vol. 1, No. I Jan, 2005 the novel. To star t with, Carignano, Nanda Kauls present abode, is symbolic of the loneliness and barrenness of human life in general and Nanda Kual in particular What pleased and satisfied her so, here at Carignano, was its barrenness. This was the chief virtue of Kasauli, of course- its starknessOccasionally an eagle swam through this clear undoubted mass of light and air .(FM 4) The lonely house is symbolic of the lonely life of Nanda Kual and Raka. The barrenness and starkness associated with its symbolise an essential human condition alienation which is the key note of all existential philosophy. The eagle symbol, like the house symbol, is repeatedly used in the course of the novel to highlight another aspect of existential philosophy, namely quest. The sight of the eagle flying high, makes Nanda long to be able to soar like the bird An eagle swept over. its wing outspread, gliding on currents of air without once moving its great muscular wings which remained in repose, in control, She Nanda Ka ul.had wished, it occurred to her, to imitate the eagle-gliding, with eyes closed (FM 19). This longing for soaring above the reach of deterministic confines is the hall mark of Rakss characters. To emphasise this aspect, the novelist employs the eagle symbol while describing Rakas walk to the Monkey Point. She was higher than the eagles, higher than Kasauli and Sanwar and all the other hills(FM 61). Thus Nanda Kauls wish and Rakas attempt merge in the eagle-symbol, which denoted their existential angst and quest for values. The forest fire scene has symbolic overtones.Like the The Fire Sermon in T. S. Eliots The Waste Land, the fire in Fire on the Mountain is a destroyer. It is also a purifier (Brown 557). By making use of the universal fire symbol. Anita Desai endows Rakas character with allegorical implications. Raka, the invalid restless little girl who is the product of a broken home, becomes the symbol of the existentialists perception of the individual who finds herself in this hostile and futile world. Yet out of compulsion, she strives to find or create values and significance for her existence.In this regard it has been observed that the symbolic implication of the forest fire is strengthen by the title of the novel, Fire on the Mountain is highly significant from the thematic point of view. The mountain symbolises Nanda Kaul and the fire is symbolic of Rakas wild nature. Nanda is the harsh belt, dry, hardened by time and age. Raka is silent, swift and threatening like forest fire The novel, thus sic may be noted as a story of inabilities of human beings to ignore the world, to place oneself in anothers position(Choudhury 79).Another factor that adds to the philosophical implications of the novel is the frequent allusions to books and poems. As in other novels in Fire on the Mountain too Anita Desai uses poetry, and this time it is a poem by Hopkins I have desired to go Where springs not fail To fields where files no sharp and sided hail And a fe w lilies below And I have asked to be The Indian Review of World Literature in English, Vol. 1, No. I Jan, 2005 Where no storms come, Where the green swell is in the havens dumb, And out of the swing to the sea. (FM 87).This poem has some connection with he character of Nanda Kaul who quotes it and the poem signifies her desire to be away from the humdrum of life, to a heaven of nature far from the madding crowd. By introducing this poignant stanza from Hopkins poem, Anita Desai highlights the theme of alienation which is the central theme of the novel. The same effect is achieved by introducing an allusion to a passage from The Pillow Book of Sei Shonagon which begins with a title When a Woman lives Alone and through the image of a dilapidated house with a poignantly desolate look (FM 27).This image has symbolic overtones as it suggests the lonely and desolate life of Nanda Kaul herself. Again, when Nanda Kaul is in the company of Raka, there is an allusion to The Travels of Macro Polo (FM 87). The reference to this book reminds the Cape of Good Hope. This also adds to the symbolism of the novel. This is miniature adventure like the one Marco Polo undertook in search of something new and promising. Thus, the characters of Nanda Kaul, Raka and Ila Das are studies of women in isolation.Essentially a writer of existential inclinations, Anita Desai examines three important aspects of this school of thought through her protagonists. The predominant traits of existentialism are alienation, quest and conflict. These three aspects are epitomised in the lives of three female protagonists. Nanda Kaul is a study in alienation and existential angst. Raka symbolises the individuals quest for meaning in an otherwise futile life. Ila Das stands for the eternal conflict enacted in the human drama between the individual and the forces of determinism.One common ground for these three characters is that they are women who live in isolation both out if choice and compulsion. De sai has examined the predicament of women in wilderness by placing these three characters Kasauli, a place border by hills and valleys, for removed from civilisation. She has consciously done it to examine the predicament and psyche of women in isolation. By placing her female protagonists with nature herself as the backdrop, Anita Desai has endowed a symbolic and universal significance to the plight of her protagonists.In this regard it has been pointed out Essentially, Desai is a novelist of existentialist concerns, chiefly considering what F. H. Heinaman described as the enduring human condition. In her novels, she has ably dwelt upon such existentialist themes as maladjustment, alienation, absurdity of human existence, quest for the ultimate meaning in life, decision, detachment, isolation and time as the fourth dimension, focussing on how women in the contemporary urban milieu are bravely struggling against or helplessly submitting to the relentless forces of absurd life (Pr asad 140).To sum up, Fire on the Mountain invites comparison with Shakespeares King Lear. In this great tragedy, when he dramatises the agony of betrayed father, Shakespeare removes Lear from the palace and places him in the wild heath- a hostile place- to suggest that the plight of Lear is identical with the suffering of every wronged father.Shakespeare employs animal imagery to indicate the rotten and corrupt world of the dramatis personae of King Lear. Images of ugly and evil animals like jackals and wolves are recurrently used creating an animal imagery that reinforces the thematic concern of the play, namely the tragedy of human life, The Indian Review of World Literature in English, Vol. 1, No. I Jan, 2005 personified in the life of Lear, a victim of indifference in old age. Anita Desais use of imagery of King Lea.

Macbeth Retold Essay

It feels strange running into something that everyone else is running out of, its my second time today. I cant explain the thrill of running into the blaze, for some its just a career but for me its my passion. As I reached the top of the burning steps I looked out the window to see don with his binding against the truck again, he was just rest there watching whilst men are in that house fortuneing their lives to save others. It angers me so much to experience that his name will be on the front page tomorrow for what Ive done again.When we got back to the station the others applauded Don as he walked in and exclaimed another fire stopped and 3 lives deliver me and Benji couldnt bear to watch him take the glory for what we had done, so we went outside to take a hint and collect the post. Whilst we were out there we met the postman, he was standing there as if he was waiting for us, me and Benji interchange a confused glance and then I said hello, he muttered youll be station animal trainer son sorry? I said and station commander he replied its as if I can tell the future he laughed as he turned to walk away what astir(predicate) me then eh? shouted Benji shouted after the postman itll be your sons and his sons and his sons and his sons the postman sang as he skipped away. Benji and I couldnt help but burst into laughter, at least it had lightened our mood after Dons little display inside. That night I t anile Beth all about what Don has been doing and how he has been taking all the credit lately, I just wanted to vent to her but she got so much angrier than I had expected and told me that I should get rid of him by killing himI want him gone and I want the praise but is this too extreme? She went on to tell me that if I didnt do it Id be a coward and theres no point in me dismission back to the fire station at all, I cant imagine not dismission back into a fire ever again. Ive realised I have to do this. I told Beth I agree and she had a plan alre ady. Im going to kill him in the old house on foster street on Tuesday night when we go there for a risk assessment, Beth told me it would be perfect and no one will know I had anything to do with it Ill focalise the place alight and blame it on the squatters there.

Changing Family Roles: Women No Longer Want the

There has been a drastic exchange in the definition of wedding party ranging the past cardinal years. Today more and more women be joining the workforce rather than staying home to take vexation of the children. It is evident that women claim been acquire, so to say, the before long end of the stick, where in heterosexual hymenealss with or without children (same sex marriages argon being left out for arguments sake), the economise is seen as what Steve Mitz in mod Rules Postwar Families 1955-present commonly refers to the breadwinner father.This husbands responsibilities be to take care of the financial aspects of the family slice the stay-at-home mom(Mitz, 16) takes care of the children, does every last(predicate) the laundry, cleans the house, goes to the grocery store, takes little jimmy to the hospital, to school, to his soccer game, does the dishes, is the husbands secretary, all on top of working full- eon. The reason for this long list of responsibilities is to compare whether the husbands contributions to the family are equal to that of the wives. No, they are non equal.Women are not happy with having to go to work on top of cooking, cleaning, and taking care of the children, go the husbands have the same responsibilities as before. It seems only fair to split the family responsibilities down the middle taking into devotion general male muscular superiority. Some men have a preconceived notion, usually open from their parents, that women are supposed to cook and clean, and every night dinner should be on the table with the rangygest office of chicken on the husbands plate.Well times are ever-changing and it is time for the husband to become sharing the chicken(not literally). It is time for the husband to start sharing duties that now working mothers have on top of their stay-at-home mom responsibilities. Steve Mitz says it best when he replies, Ameri foundation Family life has undergone a historical transformation as radical a s any that has taken place in the last one hundred fifty years. In the quotation above Mitz is implying that drastic changes are redefining gender roles in todays marriages. In the fifties it was common practice that women stayed home and men worked.Today things are different, women are more improve disabling the husbands ability to control their wives. Instead of a mutualistic marriage, men in the fifties used uneducated women, to put it point blank, as their slaves. It is apparent in todays changing cabaret that women are reexamining their situations at home, they are realizing that they are not being treated fairly. Women are reexamining sociable norms, increasing their education, and changing unfair laws making it abundantly clear that they are sick of get the short end of the stick in their marriages.The saying the short end of the stick is used in this endeavor to mean that wives are holding down full time jobs on top of cooking, cleaning etc, while husbands are not p itching in helping with the stereotypical women duties i. e. , cooking, cleaning, laundry etc. Societal norms moldiness constantly be reexamined and changed. For example, in the days of Frederick Douglas, an African American pioneer, it was an established norm that slaves were prohibited from scholarship to read. Douglas, who was curious, decided that he would learn to read by tricking the uncontaminating boys of the time into playing games that would teach him current words.Also, Douglas would try to read the notes his master would send with him on errands. Once Douglas learned to read, it changed his world, he realized that the white slave owners oppressed him and his people. Douglas became so upset over the fact that slavery was so widely trustworthy by his people that he sometimes thought he would have been better off it he had never learned to read. Since the majority of slaves of the time couldnt read, they were unknowing of their oppression, while Douglas realized his sur roundings require to change.The point of this tangent story relates to how the husband of the fifties(fifties is used as a generalization for the past regarding the time frame Mitz talks about) is like the slave owner and the wife like the unknowing slave. Today women are like Douglas, but in a different time frame. Once they had the ability to see their situations in a different light, as Douglas did, they could do something about it. Societal norms of the fifties said that if men and women didnt marry, they are denigrated as sick, neurotic or immoral, and couples who did not have children were seem as selfish. (Mitz, 18).This indicates to the reader that the norms of marriage and children masked the true light of the wives oppressive lives. Through reexamination, people eventually realize that what was once suits society no longer accommodates some divisions within that society. If these established norms exclude change, how can we as a people, let alone a couple that has to shar e a life together, work and change? The answer is we cant change unless norms are reexamined through increased education and opportunity. Increased education and opportunities are big reasons women are realizing that they are acquire the short end of the stick.Education, as it allowed Douglas to see his oppression, allows women to realize that they are pertain in a marriage that is not fair to them. Today more and more women are getting college degrees. These degrees enable women to acknowledge inequalities within their marriages. Without education, wives are repressed individuals. Degrees can excessively change what wives classify as their deepest satisfactions. A mother of the fifties may have been content with watching little jimmy grow up, which is satisfying in a different way, however, intellectual curiosity may spark a change in personal value.Do the majority of people with increased education, regardless of sex, want to work at McDonalds? Does the complexity of thought i ncrease with education? In the fifties women passed on education(Mitz, 18) entering into marriage relying on a husband to take care of them. This reliance on the husband sets the wife up to be taken advantage of. Today women are more careful about entering in the state of holy matrimony. Till death do you part is a long time where shifts in values can make that creed nearly impossible.Being more critical before getting married can save the couple and any future children headaches. Another reason why women in the past didnt go to college is because their parents only pressured the male children in the family to go to college. Males in the past also got more recognition for playing sports than their female counterparts. Again, this is due to the fact that in the past young females would not need to know how to kick a soccer ball, but rather to know how to separate whites from the darks when doing laundry. boyish women in the past were almost predestined to follow the traditionalist va lues of getting married and having children. not only does increased education and opportunity reveal to women the inequalities within their marriages, but also the changes in unfair laws further show that society knows that women are getting the short end of the stick. According to the article New Rules Postwar Families 1955-present Mitzs gives the statistic that fifty percent of all court business involves domestic relations.This astounding statistic shows that women are fed up with getting the short end of the stick. Also in the same article, Mitz expresses how women are getting the short end of the stick legally when he replies , Nineteenth century legal presumptions about the fitting roles of husband and wife has also been called into question. Until recently, the law considered the husband to be head and master of his family his surname became his childrens surname he was immune from lawsuits initiated by his wife, and he was entitled to sexualIn the quotation above, Mitz provides examples of the unjust laws regarding oppressed women. These laws catered to the husbands needs and not their wives. Mitz then says, Since the 1970s several state ultimate courts have ruled that husbands and wives can sue each other, that the husband cannot give the children his surname without the wives permission, and that husbands can be prosecuted for raping This quotation shows that women are speaking out getting unjust laws changed. These laws, which we know to be morally wrong, are now being rewritten to fit the needs of todays wives.Laws from the past and future are handout to have to be constantly reexamined in order to continually fit the needs of our changing society. Finally, wives are going to continue to get the short end of the stick until husbands start to in reality help women with family responsibilities. Todays society is ever changing and through education and reexamination of social norms and laws, the definition of gender roles are going to have to be redefined in order to distribute the family responsibilities in a fair and neutral manner.

Full Time Job Narrative Essay

I had just graduated from mellow school a typical Santa Barbara local, with ambitions of attending SBCC. I always did fairly well in school, solely was definitely more concerned with how the waves were breaking, instead how of my grades were. That all changed on June 15th. I got a call from a family friend asking if I would be interested in a summer reflect at a shipping warehouse in Carpinteria. My parents had been nagging me sidereal day in and day out to fuss a summer gambol, so this seemed so perfect. I accepted the job and my friend permit me be intimate I should show up at 730 Monday morning for my first day of work.That Monday morning, I woke up late and stumbled out of bed, threw on some clothes and was out the door with no cartridge holder for breakfast. I will never forget that car ride down to Carpinteria, and the anxious feelings I matte in my stomach. My mind was racing in a million different directions and I really had no idea what I was in for. Pulling up to t he warehouse, I remember the cold wind blowing crosswise my face, the distinct smell of ocean heavy in the air, and the flapping of the State Park flags in the distance.The job description my friend gave me over the phone didnt really stress how labor intensive it would be, so my first day I was in for quite a surprise. All day I was wadding and carrying 60-70 lbs packages and not a minute went by where I didnt regret taking my new job offer. Much to my surprise, my coworkers were all much older than me, and it was somewhat depressing to see people my parents and grandparents age doing such laborious work. One of my coworkers was an older woman named Maria, who sort of acted like the mother virtually facility.She didnt chat the best of English, still despite that, we quickly became friends, and shortly thereafter Maria began giving me all sorts of advice and pointers she cerebration would benefit me in life. Once she found out how old I was, she asked what my plans for school were. I let her know school wasnt something I was too worried about but that I would be attending City College in the fall. The look on her face was unforgettable. She looked back at me and said Sammy, school is the most important thing in your life.Maria went on to say look around you all these people have sad expressions on their faces. They didnt have the opportunity you are blithesome with. You need to realize school will lead you to a more successful and happy life. That day on the drive home I looked out at the ocean and thought how nice it would be to have zero obligations anymore and just be able to hangout at the beach. It was at that importation that I actually realized that any dream is completely unachievable without vision, determination and hard work. after(prenominal) my three months were up, my mindset towards school had completely changed. Marias words burned into my head that -I no longer thought of myself as a lazy surfer who just wanted the bare minimum, but r ather as a determined young student. School used to seem like an inescapable obstacle you had to endure, but now I truly see the importance and value of an education. While I admired the work ethic of the people I worked with in the warehouse, I know that through high education, there is better future for me.

Language and Composition Song Of Solomon

Song Of Solomon two significant minor characters BY Glossary In Toni Morrison adjudge Song of Solomon, she Introduces characters that argon significant in every situation then finds a way for them to attend to further develop the plot. The two characters that are the most interesting in the smallest way are number 1 Corinthians and Empire State. These two are involved in very little conversation and dont appear often in the first three chapters. They arent faced with difficult challenges or help the main characters, which only questions of their existence.This non only sakes them Important but Interesting while their characteristics are hard to read. First Corinthians, sister of Milkman and Magdalene loose and daughter of Ruth and Macon Dead is kind of first introduced to us in the first chapter when the antecedent says The others, who knew that the house was more prison than palace, and that the Dodge Sedan was for Sunday drives only, felt sorry for Ruth value and her dry D aughters and called her son deep. Reading this makes the author think what Is wrong with the daughters? Is there something wrong with them or are they Just very observant and say very little?Corinthians isnt really mentioned again until chapter 2 where we stick by to see her interact with her family. During the car ride the author shows us through dialogue and other indicative actions that Corinthians ability not really corresponding her family. And that lawyer- whats his name? Ruth looked around at Corinthians, who Ignored her. why would Corinthians Ignore her mother? Did her mother do something wrong to her? In this chapter I think the author is severe to tell us that Corinthians does not really like her mother but likes her father or by chance she does not really like her father Just fears him enough to respect him.This is shown when Toni Morrison writes She owns that place, Corinthians, Ruth said. I dont plow what she owns. I care about what she is. Daddy? Corinthia ns leaned toward her father for confirmation. In that little scene one might say Corinthians Is halting at something but what? During the rest of the car ride Corinthians only tries to make conversation with her father. Empire State Is a very minute character in the first three chapters of the book. thus far though he says nothing he comes as one who keeps to himself and could be hiding something. Hes presented somewhat like a criminal.He is first introduced to us when Milkman goes looking for Guitar. Toni Morrison says All but Empire State, who stood, broom In croak and drop-lipped, with the expression of a very Intelligent ten- year-old. Why does he not argue about the case with the others? Is it that he does not care? Maybe its the fact that he is taking in everything that everyone is saying and utilise to decide what his next transport is. He might be a criminal but secret code would ever guess that because he keeps to himself and acts like hes mute. Way that would makes them seem quite influential.We can use the dialogue and behavior of the characters to infer that they play a big role in the plot and might genuinely help the main character out in the end. Corinthians seems like she knows something nobody else knows, her tone is as if she is nerve-wracking to tell us something. The way Toni Morrison presents her tells us that Milkman is going to need to find out something, something that could help him move on in the story. Empire State is someone that might be hiding who he really is or hiding something very important that could help Milkman sort out his thoughts about his family and the town in general.